Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Week 5 Reflection - 5301

I don’t even know where to start. I began this journey through 5301 learning more and more about Action Research and the difference of tradition research. I have a much clearer understanding of the process. According to Harris and Dana, administrative inquiry refers to the process of a principal engaging in systematic, intentional study of his/her own administrative practices and taking action for change based on what he/she learns as a result of the inquiry. Reflection, data and change are all important to this process. Action research is more a process of exploring an educational need and collaboratively solving the problem by analyzing data, reflection and finding answers to your problem. Action research differs from traditional educational research because most of the time it brings on a change of some sort and the traditional research only examines a practice to understand how it works.
In Examining what we do to improve our schools: 8 steps from analysis to action by Sandra Harris, Stacey Edmonson, and Julie Combs, (Eye on Education, 2010). I read about the steps needed to have a successful action research. They listed the following 8 steps:
1. Examining the work: Setting the Foundation
2. Analyzing data
3. Developing deeper understanding
4. Engaging in Self-Reflection
5. Exploring Programmatic Patterns
6. Determining direction
7. Taking action for school improvement
8. Sustaining improvement
From the start of my Action Research Project I have been taking these into account. They will be such great guide throughout the process. They are steps that I can analyze my research with and make sure I am going in the correct direction.
This class has also pushed me into the blogging world. It was a scary endeavor, but I have enjoyed reading the other blogs and getting feedback on my own. It has allowed me to hear opinions that I would have never gotten to hear. I can’t wait to continue blogging!
The Strategies for Sustaining Improvement, from the Harris Text, were definitely strategies that I feel I can be utilized by anyone. The three strategies are
• Force Field Analysis
• Delphi Method
• Nominal Group Technique
When examining the 3 strategies, Force Field Analysis and Nominal Group Technique are the 2 that I feel will work best in my scenario. The Force Field Analysis gives you questions to use when you encounter resistance. Hopefully leading you down the right path when you answer them. The Nominal Group Technique is a small group technique where the each member of the group generates a need or issue for the school with no discussion from others and finally the members rewrite all the needs and rate them.
I feel that my Action Research skills have definitely grown throughout this course and I know that they will continue. This course has been packed with useful information that is necessary for the completion of our projects. My hope is that we all keep blogging. We have been given a great opportunity to learn about a multitude of topics from our classmates throughout this journey. It will be amazing!

REFERENCES:
Dana, N.F.(2009) Leading with passion and knowledge: The principal as action researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Harris, S., Edmonson, S. & Combs, J. (2010) Examining what we do to improve our schools: 8 Steps to Analysis in Action. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education

Sunday, December 9, 2012


Action Planning Template
Goal:  How will student goal-setting increase student achievements?
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
Locate appropriate strength assessments.


Shannon Marshall
Shelly Allen, Principal
12/06/12 – 12/14/12
Strength Assessments,
Computer Resources,
Time
Making sure that Assessments measure the correct criteria
Develop Survey in Survey Monkey to Establish the student’s knowledge of goal-setting.

Shannon Marshall
Shelly Allen, Principal
12/10/12-
12/12/12
Computer
Survey
Administer student survey.





Shannon Marshall
12/14/12 and repeat with new students on 1/7/13
Survey Monkey survey and
computers
Disaggregate
Survey Data
Administer strengths assessment



Shannon Marshall,
All Campus Teachers

12/14/12 and repeat with new students on 1/7/13
Computers
Strength Assessment Tools
Disaggregate
Strength Assessment
Data
Compile Data to establish student’s areas of need
All Campus Teachers,
Shannon Marshall,
Shelly Allen, Principal
1/7/13- 1/9/13
Data from surveys and assessments
List of needs
Review Needs with Students
Shannon Marshall
All Campus Teachers

1/9/13 – 1/11/13
Data
Agenda
Student Goals
Lesson Plans
Goal-Setting

Shannon Marshall
All Campus Teachers
1/9/13 – May, 2013
Agendas
Lesson Plans
DMAC Data

Student Goals
Assess Student Achievement
Leadership Team (Shannon Marshall
Shelly Allen, Principal &
Teacher Leader)
May, 2013
Student Goals,
DMAC Data
Student Achievement

Format based on Tool 7.1 from Examining What We Do to Improve Our Schools

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Week 2

As I read  Leading with passion and knowledge: The principal as action researcher by Nancy Fichman Dana, I realized that action is very important for success in your school.  In Chapter 2 Dana discusses the 9 areas in which we can find wonder. 
  • Staff Development
  • Curriculum Development
  • Individual Teacher(s)
  • Individual Student(s)
  • Community/Culture Building
  • Leadership Skills
  • Management
  • School Performance
  • Social Justice
I became more and more excited as I read through the chapter.  All of these areas are very important.  It is necessary for the principal to study his/her school and make sure that the research is necessary and is practical for the situation.  After finishing the text, I felt so much better about my action research topic.  My action research topic is "How will goal-setting increase student achievement?"  

Resource:  Fichman, Nancy Dana (2009). Leading with passion and knowledge: The principal as action
researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.